HIV dissentAtlas

Evidence

12 cited sources · both-sides readings on each item

• Retraction: Questioning the HIV-AIDS hypothesis: 30 years of dissent

  pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · primary

  • Pos A · The PMC retraction notice is read as showing a dissent article was withdrawn from the journal record, which conventional readings treat as aligning with the claim set being overstated relative to the compared public record until research supplies fuller sources.“This retracts the article”
  • Pos B · The same PMC retraction notice is read as documenting that a multi-year dissent review once ran in a public-health venue, which affirming readings treat as aligning with the claim set being under-accounted for in mainstream summaries until research supplies fuller sources.“30 years of dissent”
• Frontiers | Commentary on “Questioning the HIV–AIDS Hypothesis: 30 Years of Dissent”

  frontiersin.org · secondary

  • Pos A · The commentary is read as placing HIV–AIDS causation beside widely accepted reference claims, treated as support that dissent is overstated relative to the compared public record until this shell is sourced.“And yes, HIV causes AIDS”
  • Pos B · The commentary is read as still addressing three decades of published dissent directly, treated as support that dissent is under-accounted for in mainstream summaries until this shell is sourced.“Questioning the HIV–AIDS Hypothesis: 30 Years”
• Frontiers | Commentary: Questioning the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis: 30 Years of Dissent

  frontiersin.org · secondary

  • Pos A · Under skeptical readings, this Frontiers commentary is treated as documenting a dissent stream already weighed as overstated against the wider public record; sources must still be supplied before the shell is treated as settled.“Questioning the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis: 30 Years of Dissent”
  • Pos B · Under affirming readings, this Frontiers commentary is treated as documenting a dissent stream still weighed as under-accounted in mainstream summaries; sources must still be supplied before the shell is treated as settled.“Questioning the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis: 30 Years of Dissent”
• Commentary: Questioning the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis: 30 Years of Dissent

  pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · primary

  • Pos A · Conventional readings treat this PMC-hosted commentary as framing long-running HIV-AIDS dissent with descriptors such as denialism and pseudoscience, so the dissent claim set is read as overstated relative to the compared public-health record until research supplies fuller sources for this shell.“AIDS denialism, pseudoscience, public health”
  • Pos B · Affirming readings treat the same commentary’s title and thirty-year dissent framing as documenting a continuing literature thread that questions the hypothesis, so the dissent claim set is read as under-accounted for in mainstream summaries until research supplies fuller sources for this shell.“Questioning the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis: 30 Years of Dissent”
• Commentary on “Questioning the HIV–AIDS Hypothesis: 30 Years of Dissent”

  pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · primary

  • Pos A · Skeptical readings treat this PMC commentary as placing the dissent literature under AIDS-denialism keywords, so the claim set is read as overstated relative to the compared public record until sources are supplied.“AIDS denialism, HIV/AIDS, Duesberg, pseudoscience”
  • Pos B · Affirming readings treat this PMC commentary as one mainstream response that leaves the dissent literature under-accounted for, so the claim set is read as incompletely reflected in summaries until sources are supplied.“Questioning the HIV–AIDS Hypothesis: 30 Years of Dissent”
• Publisher Statement on “Questioning the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis: 30 Years of Dissent”

  pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · primary

  • Pos A · Conventional readings treat this publisher notice as cited indication that dissent pieces have drawn formal expressions of concern in the indexed public record, so the claim set is read as overstated relative to settled summaries until research supplies fuller sources.“expression of concern about the following article”
  • Pos B · Affirming readings treat this same publisher notice as cited indication that a dissent article entered the public literature and remains under active mapping, so the claim set is read as under-accounted in mainstream digests until research supplies fuller sources.“Questioning the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis: 30 Years of Dissent”
• Frontiers | Retraction: Questioning the HIV-AIDS hypothesis: 30 years of dissent

  frontiersin.org · secondary

  • Pos A · Frontiers' retraction notice is treated as showing that a paper questioning the HIV-AIDS link was withdrawn from the journal record, which skeptical readings cite as aligning with the view that dissent claims are overstated pending further sources.“Questioning the HIV-AIDS hypothesis: 30 years of dissent”
  • Pos B · Frontiers' retraction notice is treated as documenting that dissent questioning the HIV-AIDS hypothesis appeared in a public-health journal before withdrawal, which affirming readings cite as showing such views remain under-accounted for in mainstream summaries pending further sources.“Questioning the HIV-AIDS hypothesis: 30 years of dissent”
• Frontiers | RETRACTED: Questioning the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis: 30 Years of Dissent

  frontiersin.org · secondary

  • Pos A · Skeptical readings treat the retracted status of this Frontiers piece as indicating dissent is overstated relative to the public record, and the item is cited as needing more sources before settlement.“RETRACTED: Questioning the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis”
  • Pos B · Affirming readings treat the publication of this lengthy dissent review as showing the topic is under-accounted for in mainstream summaries, and the item is cited as needing more sources before settlement.“Questioning the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis: 30 Years of Dissent”
• Frontiers | RETRACTED: Questioning the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis: 30 Years of Dissent

  journal.frontiersin.org · secondary

  • Pos A · Public materials including this Frontiers listing are read as showing a dissent article later marked retracted; skeptical readings treat the Hiv Aids Dissent claim set as overstated relative to the compared public record, with sources still required before the shell is settled.“RETRACTED: Questioning the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis”
  • Pos B · Public materials including this Frontiers listing are read as showing long-running hypothesis questioning under a dissent frame; affirming readings treat the Hiv Aids Dissent claim set as under-accounted for in mainstream summaries, with sources still required before the shell is settled.“Questioning the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis: 30 Years”
• Commentary: Questioning the HIV-AIDS hypothesis: 30 years of dissent

  aidstruth.org · secondary

  • Pos A · Conventional readings cite this commentary as treating dissent materials as omitting long-recorded epidemiological and laboratory associations presented as linking HIV detection and progression markers with AIDS outcomes in the compared public record.“ignores the overwhelming evidence that HIV is a causative”
  • Pos B · Affirming readings cite this same commentary as treating multi-decade dissent literature as already placed outside mainstream summaries, which they read as leaving those methodological challenges under-accounted for in brief public-facing accounts.“Questioning the HIV-AIDS hypothesis: 30 years of dissent”
• Commentary on “Questioning the HIV–AIDS Hypothesis: 30 Years of Dissent”

  web.archive.org · primary

  • Pos A · Public materials are read as framing the archived PMC commentary title as conventional pushback, treated as showing dissent claims remain overstated relative to the compared record until research supplies fuller sources.“Questioning the HIV–AIDS Hypothesis: 30 Years of Dissent”
  • Pos B · Public materials are read as framing the archived PMC commentary title as marking ongoing debate, treated as showing dissent claims remain under-accounted in mainstream summaries until research supplies fuller sources.“Questioning the HIV–AIDS Hypothesis: 30 Years of Dissent”
• Questioning the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis: 30 Years of Dissent

  pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · primary

  • Pos A · Conventional readings treat the PMC notice that the article was retracted, together with the NLM disclaimer that inclusion does not imply endorsement, as indicating that dissent materials in public indexes are read as overstated relative to the settled record until stronger sources are supplied.“This article has been retracted.”
  • Pos B · Affirming readings treat the indexed article on thirty years of dissent, and its prior placement in a public-health journal before the later retraction notice, as cited as showing that dissenting claim sets remain under-accounted for in mainstream summaries until research supplies further sources.“Questioning the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis: 30 Years of Dissent”