Speculative theory
Human experimentsAtlas
Historical Events · Documented historical programs
They ran medical tests on people who did not consent.
Open the caseThe disputes
Competing accounts, side by side. Not a verdict.
1. Did subjects of major government and institutional medical experiments give meaningful informed consent?
Position A
Compared records are read as favoring the affirming case over the competing public account.
Position B
Compared records are read as favoring the skeptical case over the competing public account.
2. Was Project MK-Ultra mainly scientific research or a deliberate mind-control and torture program?
Position A
Compared records are read as favoring the affirming case over the competing public account.
Position B
Compared records are read as favoring the skeptical case over the competing public account.
3. How extensive were U.S. human radiation experiments beyond the cases reviewed by ACHRE?
Position A
Compared records are read as favoring the affirming case over the competing public account.
Position B
Compared records are read as favoring the skeptical case over the competing public account.
In full
Did subjects of major government and institutional medical experiments give meaningful informed consent?
Position A
Compared records are read as favoring the affirming case over the competing public account.
Falsification · This account would be weakened if primary sources required the competing reading.
- Compared records are read as favoring the affirming case over the competing public account.
- Assumption (weak): The compared public record is incomplete on this point.
Position B
Compared records are read as favoring the skeptical case over the competing public account.
Falsification · This account would be weakened if primary sources required the competing reading.
- Compared records are read as favoring the skeptical case over the competing public account.
- Assumption (weak): The compared public record is incomplete on this point.
Was Project MK-Ultra mainly scientific research or a deliberate mind-control and torture program?
Position A
Compared records are read as favoring the affirming case over the competing public account.
Falsification · This account would be weakened if primary sources required the competing reading.
- Compared records are read as favoring the affirming case over the competing public account.
- Assumption (weak): The compared public record is incomplete on this point.
Position B
Compared records are read as favoring the skeptical case over the competing public account.
Falsification · This account would be weakened if primary sources required the competing reading.
- Compared records are read as favoring the skeptical case over the competing public account.
- Assumption (weak): The compared public record is incomplete on this point.
How extensive were U.S. human radiation experiments beyond the cases reviewed by ACHRE?
Position A
Compared records are read as favoring the affirming case over the competing public account.
Falsification · This account would be weakened if primary sources required the competing reading.
- Compared records are read as favoring the affirming case over the competing public account.
- Assumption (weak): The compared public record is incomplete on this point.
Position B
Compared records are read as favoring the skeptical case over the competing public account.
Falsification · This account would be weakened if primary sources required the competing reading.
- Compared records are read as favoring the skeptical case over the competing public account.
- Assumption (weak): The compared public record is incomplete on this point.